As promised, we said we would publish the MCA’s “notes” in relation to the 2015 application – there is so much in there that we are going to have to divide up. What we will say is that on this occasion, the MCA have done their job and provided a robust response, picking up many of the points we did, and more. When read in its entirety, it is a damning indictment of the poor quality of the initial application. No doubt public interest and the threat of judicial review may have heightened the interest of the MCA in this one – interestingly the same level of robust response would appear not to have been applied to the previous Nigg application (2012) or Scapa Flow, however, that is a different story.
Tonight, the headlines, the MCA say – 1Tonne maximum spill not sufficiently proven…..the risk of collision needs quantified….a realistic worst case needs to identified and modelled. Heard any of that before?
Warning: call_user_func() expects parameter 1 to be a valid callback, function 'skt_gardening_lite_comment' not found or invalid function name in /home/blackisl/cromartyrising.com/wp-includes/class-walker-comment.php on line 184
Warning: call_user_func() expects parameter 1 to be a valid callback, function 'skt_gardening_lite_comment' not found or invalid function name in /home/blackisl/cromartyrising.com/wp-includes/class-walker-comment.php on line 184